LET’S CHANGE THE PRIVATIZED MONEY BOND SYSTEM
Shawn was 16-years-old when he was charged with first-degree murder. His bond started at $2 million dollars and eventually was reduced to $500,000. (Herald Sun 9/22/17) Only the very wealthy could make such a high bond.
Shawn was not rich so he stayed in the Durham County Jail for more than three years waiting. He always said he wanted a jury trial so he could be declared not guilty. Finally, after eleven jurors were selected over two days, the prosecutor dismissed the charges. Someone else had admitted to the killing.
Our U.S. and N.C. Constitutions prohibit excessive bail. For an African-American teen from a poor family, a modest bond was far beyond his means. Blacks remain in jail pretrial at a much higher rate than whites.
Studies have found a link between pretrial detention and bad trial outcomes – convictions.
We should provide additional funding for non-money pretrial relase programs like house arrest and electronic monitoring, and use more scientific bases for determining risk and threat to flee.
Maybe our assumptions are wrong: Isn’t a millionaire more likely to have the resources to get away than a poor teen with with a court-appointed lawyer?
Shawn wasn’t convicted so he can’t be pardoned. He’s not eligible for money set aside for those wrongfully convicted even though he sat in jail for over three years.
Is DWI Different? Impaired Driving probation violations and the limits of judicial authority
The Justice Reinvestment Act of 2011 (JRA) enacted major changes to the way probation violations are handled by the North Carolina criminal justice system.
Even three and a half years later some probation officers, attorneys, and other court actors are struggling to make sense of the JRA and its impact on probation violation proceedings.
This is especially true in the area of Impaired Driving probation.
Many court actors believe that “DWI is different” when it comes to probation, but is that really true?
In some areas, DWI really is different. DWI is different when it comes to the way probation is imposed after conviction.
Because DWI is not sentenced according the Structured Sentencing Act, North Carolina General Statute (N.C.G.S.) 15A-1342 says that a judge can place a person convicted of DWI on probation for up to five years without any special findings of fact.
Structured Sentencing cases, however, require the judge to make findings of fact if he or she sentences a defendant to a shorter or longer period of probation than is standard, depending on the type of case. For most misdemeanors, the standard maximum period of probation is 18 months. (N.C.G.S. 15A-1343.2(d).)
But how about probation violation hearings for people on probation for DWI? Is DWI different in those cases? The short answer is no.
Here is where a defendant can get into serious trouble if the probation officer, the defense attorney or the judicial official does not clearly understand the application of the Justice Reinvestment Act (JRA) to DWI probation cases.
The JRA severely limits judges’ ability to revoke defendants’ probation and send them to jail. Only in certain, fairly narrow circumstances can a judge order a defendant to serve his entire suspended sentence in custody. (Judges can order defendants to serve shorter periods in jail, up to 90 days, for most “minor” probation violations.)
These limits on a judge’s authority to send probation violators to jail or prison apply regardless of whether the conviction is for DWI or any other offense.
In short, judges are subject to the same limitations on their power to revoke probation in DWI cases as they are in other criminal cases.
If you are on probation and have a pending probation violation hearing, make sure your attorney understands the application of the JRA to your case and how best to defend and vindicate your legal rights in court.